<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I use a Mac&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://macsingularity.org/2007/01/05/why-i-use-a-mac/</link>
	<description>IRAF and More - For Mac Using Astronomers and Astrophysicists</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcos</title>
		<link>http://macsingularity.org/2007/01/05/why-i-use-a-mac/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macsingularity.org/2007/01/05/why-i-use-a-mac/#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, if you want a free OS or one that lets you recompile the kernel (and you can recompile the xnu kernel that lies underneath OS X as Darwin is open source, I'm fairly sure.)  Never-the-less, I prefer an OS where things like the mouse and sound and audio CDs just work, and the same OS can do cool UNIX-stuff as well.  Dual-booting seems inelegant to me.  I suppose now with Parallels you can experience both Linux and OS X at the same time.  If you like that, go for it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as a "new lease on old hardware?"  MacOS X 10.4 runs quite well on my 400 MHz PowerMac G4.  And in fact every release of OS X has been &lt;em&gt;faster&lt;/em&gt; on the same hardware, not slower.  (Granted, there wasn't much place to go but up from 10.0's performance.)  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, I still just don't see any significant advantages of Linux over OS X on a laptop for the vast majority of users.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, if you want a free OS or one that lets you recompile the kernel (and you can recompile the xnu kernel that lies underneath OS X as Darwin is open source, I&#8217;m fairly sure.)  Never-the-less, I prefer an OS where things like the mouse and sound and audio CDs just work, and the same OS can do cool UNIX-stuff as well.  Dual-booting seems inelegant to me.  I suppose now with Parallels you can experience both Linux and OS X at the same time.  If you like that, go for it.</p>

<p>As far as a &#8220;new lease on old hardware?&#8221;  MacOS X 10.4 runs quite well on my 400 MHz PowerMac G4.  And in fact every release of OS X has been <em>faster</em> on the same hardware, not slower.  (Granted, there wasn&#8217;t much place to go but up from 10.0&#8217;s performance.)  </p>

<p>So, I still just don&#8217;t see any significant advantages of Linux over OS X on a laptop for the vast majority of users.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoBloggit</title>
		<link>http://macsingularity.org/2007/01/05/why-i-use-a-mac/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>GoBloggit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 20:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://macsingularity.org/2007/01/05/why-i-use-a-mac/#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why I use a Mac…...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah, why? Your typical  Mac comes with all the Unix goodies and goodness you could ever need. But there are a bunch of Linux PPC distributions that you can, if you feel the urge, install on your Apple hardware.
If you&#8217;ve been alive the last coup...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why I use a Mac…&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>Yeah, why? Your typical  Mac comes with all the Unix goodies and goodness you could ever need. But there are a bunch of Linux PPC distributions that you can, if you feel the urge, install on your Apple hardware.
If you&#8217;ve been alive the last coup&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
